The bar chart below shows Scotland s to the rest of the UK and the rest of the world for the year 2014 Summarize the information and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart illustrates the comparison of export trading in Scotland with rest of the UK as well as with rest of the world in the year 2014. Units are measured in pounds.

Overall, the amount that contribute towards rest of the world is greater than rest of the UK in most of the industry. Greater amount of exports to rest of the world was observed in the business services & finance, hotels and restaurant services whilst a significantly lesser amount of trading was recorded in electrical & instrument engineering industry. Similarly, greater amount of trading to the rest of the UK was observed in chemical & mineral product industry whilst lesser amount of trading in other manufacturing industries.

In terms of trading to rest of the world, the business services & finance, hotels and restaurant services contributes to £13.8 billion which is higher than any other industries where as the minimum amount of trading was £2.3 billion(electrical & instrument engineering). The trading to agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining industry was increased by £0.1 billion from the minimum amount. Similarly, the same case takes place in manufacture of food & drink industry and other manufacturing industry(£5.8 billion & £5.9 billion respectively). The second largest amount of exports were done in chemical and mineral product industry which is £9.5 billion.

On the other hand, the maximum amount of exports to the rest of the world is only £5 billion(chemical and mineral product). The minimum amount of exports is £0.6 billion for agriculture, forestry, fishing and mining industry. The trade gradually rises to rest of the industries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (8 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ich is higher than any other industries where as the minimum amount of trading was £2.3 ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, similarly, so, well, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41860465116 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02841885391 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426356589147 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1900533483 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196030246687 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931568473134 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115284384457 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172902726605 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124770521115 0.0819641961636 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.