The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The graph above illustrates five categories, on which the USA, Canada, UK and Japan spent their money in 2009. Five categories are Food, Housing, Transportation, Health care and Clothing. At first glance, it can be noticed that food, housing and transportation are three main spheres, while health care and clothing are less funded.
Japan and UK spent about 42% of the total amount on food in total, 20 and 22% respectively. Canada and the US's expenditure accounted for about 29% in total. The United states is the country that spent more money on housing, at roughly 25%. United Kingdom had spent about 2% less, standing at 23%. Canada and Japan funded that sector less than previous two, at just above 20% each.
Canada had spent exactly 20% on transportation, which is the highest index for all 4 presented countries. Then stands the US, at just below 20 per cent. Unlike these two governments, UK and Japan had spent about 25% in total. The least funded sectors are health care and clothing. Canada and Japan spent equal amount of money on health care, while the US and UK spent approximately 15% in total. The US and Japan spent almost equally on clothing, at just 4 and 5% respectively. Canada and UK spent 10% in total.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76635514019 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59067376023 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518691588785 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1151600071 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.0 112.824112599 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2666666667 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137764055453 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565821148038 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387473849668 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100812995654 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236046505075 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.