The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas.

Essay topics: The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas.

n0air9x9's picture

The bar chart illustrates the three chief explanations for land damage in four regions, namely Africa, Asia, Australia and Europe.

It is apparent that across the board, breeding is the main factor, with the only exception being Asia, where tree-cutting is responsible for the greatest area of damaged land.

Looking at Africa’s figure, 500 million hectares were damaged by breeding, which was also the largest figure in the four areas. Approximately 370 million hectares were affected by cutting of trees while farming activities harmed 300 million hectares of land. A similar ranking is observed for Australia and Europe, albeit at comparatively small scales. In both countries, breeding is also the main cause (at 200 million hectares and 110 million hectares, respectively) while deforestation and farming exert starkly less damage.

By contrast, Asia differs from this pattern. Deforestation damaged around 450 million hectares of land, followed by farming (420 million hectares) and lastly breeding (at slightly under 400 million hectares).

Votes: 
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by other users:
Post date Users Rates More about the essay
1 month 6 days ago n0air9x9 84 Read full essay
4 months 1 week ago hohadang99 78 Read full essay
More essays by this user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the greatest area of damaged land. Looking at Africa's figure, 500 mil...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at slightly under 400 million hectares.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, look, so, while, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69182389937 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81190460078 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647798742138 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9204640125 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206662636169 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906232398127 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795147299706 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14188053869 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802032384961 0.0819641961636 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages