The statistical bar graph illustrates information about telephone calls which were done by three different types in UK between 1995 and 2000. Data is caliberated into minutes (billions).
The main striking feature is that mainly citizens did local-fixed line calls while, less calls did by mobiles (all calls). The upward trend observed throughout the period in national or international and mobile calls whereas, local calls declined in after years.
It can be clearly seen that the largest accountable share of calling was done with local lines (70 minutes)(billion) in 1995 after, it experience noticeable upsurge till 1999 and touch the peak point with 90 minutes (billion). From 2000 to 2002 local calls had downward slope interestingly, reached at its initial point.
Moving further, Britishers did call by natinal and international lines in 1995, 1996 and 1997 with 37, 40 and 44 minutes (billion) respectively however, 2,5 and 7 minutes (billion) oderly did by mobiles. In 1999, calls by former was five times more then latter. The difference of almost half observed in both in the years of 2000 and 2001. The highest ponit touch by both categories in 2002 natinal and international with 63 minutes (billion) and mobiles with 45 minutes (billion).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun calls is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...izens did local-fixed line calls while, less calls did by mobiles all calls. The upw...
^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the period in national or international and mobile calls whereas, local calls de...
^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'experiences'?
Suggestion: experiences
...nes 70 minutesbillion in 1995 after, it experience noticeable upsurge till 1999 and touch ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...nd touch the peak point with 90 minutes billion. From 2000 to 2002 local calls had down...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...996 and 1997 with 37, 40 and 44 minutes billion respectively however, 2,5 and 7 minutes...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...respectively however, 2,5 and 7 minutes billion oderly did by mobiles. In 1999, calls b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...99, calls by former was five times more then latter. The difference of almost half o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 430, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...tinal and international with 63 minutes billion and mobiles with 45 minutes billion.
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 466, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...tes billion and mobiles with 45 minutes billion.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17326732673 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7362447962 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648514851485 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.712338645 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186637394799 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075138826082 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032062741702 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115665767424 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322620923067 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.