The bar chart shows the amount spent on digital games in the USA and China from 2010 to 2017 and the pie chart shows global spending on these games in 2017

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the amount spent on digital games in the USA and China from 2010 to 2017 and the pie chart shows global spending on these games in 2017.

The bar graph compares how much money people in the USA and China spent on digital gaming between 2010-2017, while the pie charts illustrates the total amount of money spent on each type of games worldwide.

Generally speaking, it is obvious that the totals spent on gaming by Americans and Chinese showed the upward trends during an 8-year period. In 2017, the people all over the world spent most of their money on mobile game compared to console and PC types.

In 2010, Americans spent approximately 16 billion dollars which was about 2 times Chinese people spent on digital games. The amount of money spent by both countries’ population increased over the period. The total amounts of money were roughly equal in 2016 and Chinese took a lead in 2017 with approximately $28 billion, while American spent around $25 billion.

In 2017, a majority of money were spent on mobile gaming about $46.1 billion worldwide. The other two were nearly the same amount, console games gained 27% of the market share, whereas the PC games took 31%.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89265536723 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37792039613 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1784127553 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355677155824 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156866035632 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999845738366 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234430542821 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10355671052 0.0819641961636 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.