The bar chart shows the average price of a house in the UK in different years. The pie chart shows the percentage between owners, people renting and those with second homes.
The given bar chart illustrates the medium fee of the accommodation in the uk during 1980-2005 period while the pie chart provides the information about the proportion between owners, people renting and those with the second houses.
It can be seen clearly from the chart is that the figure for average price of a houses deceased yearly over 25 years. There was a slight rise in the medium amount of money for a house from nearly 25,000 to above 30,00 in 1985 which was followed by an increase sharply by under 25,000 in 1990. The medium spending on an accommodation in 2000 was increase double than 1990, it continued to rise until it reached the highest amount which was ever recorded with slightly under 20,000 in the last year.
Moving to the pie chart, the figure for renting ranked the greatest percent between 1985 and 1995 with 59% and 53%, respectively, but then it fell dramatically to 44% in 2005. On the other hand, the percentage of owners grew gradually from 34% to 37% in 1995 and 53% in 2005. Likewise, the quantity of the second homes increase at first to 10% during 10 years, but then fell sharply by 7% in 2005.
Overall, the spectacularly grow in the figure for average price of a house in the UK created a great fell on the proportion of people renting and having the second home in 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 1985 which was followed by an increase sharply by under 25,000 in 1990. The med...
^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rply by under 25,000 in 1990. The medium spending on an accommodation in 2000 was...
^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'accommodation'.
Suggestion: accommodation
...25,000 in 1990. The medium spending on an accommodation in 2000 was increase double than 1990,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccommodation in 2000 was increase double than 1990, it continued to rise until it...
^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pie chart, the figure for renting ranked the greatest percent between 1985 and 19...
^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew gradually from 34% to 37% in 1995 and 53% in 2005. Likewise, the quantity of t...
^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fell on the proportion of people renting and having the second home in 2005.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, likewise, second, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60593220339 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43444280652 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529661016949 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2967594053 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.875 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28411864998 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12514573381 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11082710084 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191153101439 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102112955064 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.