The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.Summarize the information by describing the main features of the chart and making comparisons where appropriate.Write at least 150 words
The bar graph depicts the proportion of four different waste disposal methods used by Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman. At a glance, compositing is the least adopted method for destruction of waste and in most of the cities, incineration and landfill are popular methods among all the regions.
About 75% of the waste disposal in Toronto is carried by landfill, which is the highest proportion among all the cities and further followed by Amman, which conducts nearly half of the waste disposal by landfill. Kuala Lumpur’s proportion of landfill disposal was almost five times lesser than the Toronto’s amount, whereas the majority of disposal carried out by incineration. Incineration in also popular strategy, accounting for almost 40% of disposal methods in Amman and Madrid.
Among all the cities, which uses recycling, Madrid used the most around one-fifth portion which is similar to Kuala Lumpur’s recycling ratio. Contrastingly, Amman and Toronto preferred recycling at a negligible amount. Compositing, by far is the least preferred method among the four techniques and is seen to be used by less than one-tenth of the disposals carried out by the four countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32978723404 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84279525024 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7430975749 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275839560264 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139058109223 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842657617391 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211324854605 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672535374823 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.