The bar chart shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of car trips made by both men and women for eight different purposes in 2005

Overall, commuting to work was the most common purpose for both men and women to use their cars. However, the data for others like visiting town, going to the bank, running errands, visiting friends, recreation, shopping, and going to courses had huge differences between women and men.

The time men spent on using cars to work accounted for more than half of all car trips, which was about 13% higher than the percentage of women. The proportion of shopping purpose lagged behind work with 18% for women and 10% for men. The percentage of visiting town of men was roughly 8% while the figure for women was much lower with 2%. The same trend can be seen in recreation that the percentage of men was 11% which was 8% higher than women.

In terms of four remaining purposes, the opposite trend was true. About 13% of car trips women spent on going to the courses whereas the figure for men was just 7%. Whilst cars were used by around 8% to 10% for going to the banks, visiting friends, and running errands, approximately 4% of men used cars for the same purposes.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 236, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ork with 18% for women and 10% for men. The percentage of visiting town of men was ...
^^^
Line 6, column 341, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...igure for women was much lower with 2%. The same trend can be seen in recreation th...
^^^
Line 8, column 102, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...rue. About 13% of car trips women spent on going to the courses whereas the figure for m...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60563380282 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28991542797 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49765258216 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5397169886 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0793989447172 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403165281289 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387697630461 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805960897152 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792792299594 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.