The bar graph gives information about the spending of time of youngsters in hours per week in Chester from 2002 to 2007. Timing of teenagers is being spent on going to pubs/disco, watching television, shopping, homework, sort, watching DVDs and bowling.
Overall it can be seen that huge time went on watching television while very less on bowling.
To go to pubs or discos teenagers used to spend approximate 10hr in a week from 2002 to 2006 and then it has increased substantially to 17hr per week in the subsequent year. Watching television started at 25hr in 2002 and increased to 37hr in 5 years. Time spending on Shopping started from over 5hr and increased to 15hrs and it was constant for the last 2 year, that is, in 2006 and 2007.
Efficiency to seat for homework has decreased from over 10hr to 6hr in these six years. Youngsters used to play sports for 10hr in 2002 but it decreased to almost 2hr in 2007. The trend of watching DVDs has got increased till 2004 and decreased thereafter. Fluctuation has been observed in spending of time on Bowling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...007. Timing of teenagers is being spent on going to pubs/disco, watching television, sho...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70212765957 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66970411363 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537234042553 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8688302195 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254907265994 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10398321153 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127976498035 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149140290845 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115055804262 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.