The bar chart illustrates the counts of trips done by children to travel from and to for school with various types of transport in 1990 and 2010. Types of transport used in a country are car passenger, walk, cycle, bus.
Overall, in 1990 the highest trips are done by walk while in 2010 it is done by car passenger. However, ca passenger was least popular in 1990. Trips done by walking and cycling has reduced in large amount in the given period.
There was huge increase in the trips around more than double by car passenger from 1990 to 2010. It started around over 4 million and reached to above 10 million. Having said that, in 1990 walking trips being done by children was over 12 million which reduced to 6 million.
Trips made by cycle was also decreased by approximate 4 million fro over 6 million. There was around 2.5 million reductions in trips of those who used to go to school by walking and bus. The least change has seen in bus transportation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the least'.
Suggestion: was the least
...by car passenger. However, ca passenger was least popular in 1990. Trips done by walking ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...also decreased by approximate 4 million fro over 6 million. There was around 2.5 mi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53714285714 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38516503515 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525714285714 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9679944985 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.1818181818 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251960560611 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101349917251 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922376015257 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172505539888 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106543108483 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.