The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
The bar chart compares the frequency of commuting to schools by various transportation means by pupils at the age between 5 and 12 in 1990 and 2010.
Generally speaking, most of the pupils travelled to and from school by using cars or walking in both years. Moreover, while frequency of travelling to school by cars increased significantly, all other transportation methods saw an obvious decrease in number of trips made by pupils in 2010.
In 1990, walking was the most selected method for commuting to school, with over 12 million of trips made by pupils.This was almost staggering three times higher than the trips made using cars (marginally over 4 millions). Meanwhile, numbering at about 6 million, trips made by the other travelling methods were practically identical.
In 2010, it is clear that decrease could be noticed on the figures by all the transportation methods except being car passengers, which increased almost threefold, reaching 11 million to become the highest number in the chart. In stark contrast, the figure for walking, which was the most popular way commuting to school in 1990, although dropped over 2 times, was still the second preferred way in 2010. Lastly, travelling by cycling, walking and bus, and bus were at 2 million, 3 million and 5 million respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...over 12 million of trips made by pupils.This was almost staggering three times highe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, moreover, second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09813084112 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88467674863 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2574234242 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.375 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283274221428 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133281398817 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579452825674 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18868962467 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514331410898 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.