The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.

A glimpse at the bar chart given compared the disparities of tertiary qualification held by Australian between both genders in 1999.

As seen from the data, it is clear that skilled vocational diploma was mainly held by men, with 90% of male owned such qualification compared to a mere 10% of female. Conversely, comprising two-thirds, female undergraduate diploma holder was doubled that of male (30%). Bachelor’s degree, meanwhile, saw a similar proportion between both genders at about 50%.

When it comes to postgraduate studies, evidently less females studied than males. Percentage of girls having postgraduate diploma was just 30%, which was over two times smaller than that of boys. Lastly, masters degree was held by 40% of females and 60% of men respectively.

To summarise, while a dominated portion of Australian men held skilled vocational diploma, undergraduate diploma was the most prevailed qualification among women in Australia.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun females is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...omes to postgraduate studies, evidently less females studied than males. Percentage ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, lastly, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52380952381 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16900218572 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7128848556 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152880956404 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654109604173 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620559355559 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106058409187 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507500093937 0.0819641961636 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.