The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999.
The bar chart given illustrates the proportion of five different degrees obtained by females and males in Australia in 1999.
Overall, it is evident that there were two degrees which were on the top of the list of female’s qualification. Meanwhile, the remaining qualifications (diploma, postgraduate diploma, and master degree), shared the biggest proportion of males holded-degree.
Generally, there was a significant difference between the qualifications held by both sexes in the reported year. males contributed to the major proportion of skilled vocational diploma (90%). However, in two categories (undergraduate and postgraduate diploma), males and females shared a similar proportion (70% each). Moreover, men and women had the lowest percentages on the undergraduate diploma and skilled vocational diploma, while the former was 10% the letter was 36%.
In addition, among the five post-school qualifications shown, men outnumber women almost in all degrees, except for bachelor degree, where women shared the larger number than men, 54% and 45% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'qualifications'' or 'qualification's'?
Suggestion: qualifications'; qualification's
...qualification. Meanwhile, the remaining qualifications diploma, postgraduate diploma, and mast...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Males
...eld by both sexes in the reported year. males contributed to the major proportion of ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8164556962 4.92477711251 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29681229655 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2542107414 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229051776762 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919234835867 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717080335932 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140979218771 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652975178396 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.4140731707 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.