The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years.
The diagrams illustrate the share of France energy production in 1995 compared to 2005.
Overall, there were an increase number in three sources of energy production (Gas, Coal, Nuclear), while Petro observed a decreased figure in last reported year. In addition, Coal witnessed as the highest proportion of France-produced energy in both years.
In the first reported year, Coal and Gas was reported as the larger share of sources energy production. They accounted for just below bellow a-third. Following which was Petro which responsible for 29.27% and in 2005, it experienced a decline to about a-fifth in the following year. The remaining figure (Nuclear and Other) formed a small proportion, the former was 6.4% and the latter shared 4.9% of the total number.
Moving to second chart, Coal and Gas was the main energy production sources in 2005. They accounted 30.93% and 30.31% respectively. The number of energy production by nuclear and other sources rose precisely just below 5% each figure. In contrast, the number of energy produced by Petro declined to just about 10% compared to that of produced in the 1995.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19672131148 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64288870377 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535519125683 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5839887077 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4545454545 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172328021332 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760980613582 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651616085158 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126899643521 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052259904441 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.