The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years.
The pie charts provide a comparison between 5 types of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005. It is measured in percentages.
Overall, the biggest source of energy is Coal in both years while energy production through Other resources is the smallest. Furthermore, except for Petro, the energy production by all sources increased in 2005 compared to 1995.
To begin, the production of energy through Coal started at 29.80% in 1995. This figure experienced a modest increase of 1% in 2005 reaching 30.93%.
Similar growth in the figure is evident for energy production through Gas starting at 29.63% and reaching 30.31%.
The energy production through Nuclear power and other resources started at 6.4% and 4.9% and increased significantly by nearly 4% and 5% reaching 10.10% and 9.1% respectively in 2005.
On the other hand, it can be seen that in 1995 energy produced through Petro accounted for 29.27% whereas the figure dropped significantly by nearly 10% reaching 19.55% in 2005.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21118012422 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76486132769 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2964148147 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2222222222 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182570488748 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950880795881 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101223993098 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118743717728 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950955036178 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.