The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart provided illustrates how many grams of four different type of meats ware consumed by people in Europe nation per week from 1979 to 2004. Overall, it is evident that the consuming of chicken saw an increase during the period, meanwhile three other kind of meats (beef, lamb, and fish) experienced downward trend.
Generally, chicken was unpopular consumed meat by European people in initial year. it was stood at around 140 in 1979. This number was much smaller compare to meat from cow and sheep. however, the figure increased steadily in a decade and surpassed the number of eaten-beef in 1998 (approximately 210). Afterward, the trend fluctuated before it reached the highest figure at around 260, and ending the period with 250 grams.
beef, however, started the period as the highest number of eaten-meat (approximately 220). The figure witnessed fluctuation between 1979 and 1984. On the next three years (1985 – 1987) beef consumption was flat at around 235 grams. Following that, the consumption of beef decreased dramatically to roughly 100 grams at the end of reported year. Furthermore, the remaining meat consumptions (lamb and fish) saw a decrease trend during the period. lamb stood at 150 in early reported year and decreased more than twofold in 2004. While, fish were consumed at around 60 in 1979 and experienced slightly decreased during the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...uring the period, meanwhile three other kind of meats beef, lamb, and fish experienc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...eat by European people in initial year. it was stood at around 140 in 1979. This n...
^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ler compare to meat from cow and sheep. however, the figure increased steadily in a dec...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Beef
...nd ending the period with 250 grams. beef, however, started the period as the hig...
^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lamb
...saw a decrease trend during the period. lamb stood at 150 in early reported year and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11061946903 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64551819952 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588495575221 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9907422159 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1428571429 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142471422023 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549110631568 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319619307289 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100947706572 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343933653781 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.