The charts below illustrate the average bed use in three typical hospitals internationally and the proportion of hospital budgets allocated to in-patient care before and after day-surgery was introduced in 2003.
The diagrams illustrate the average number of beds utilized in three international hospitals (Chinese, ukrainian and french), and the proportion of budget invested for in-patient care prior to and after day surgery was introduced in 2003.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the average number of beds used in the hospitals, and the percentage of hospital budget allocated to in-patient care experienced a small decrease.
In 1997, the average number of beds used in China was 70, increasing slowly from just below 80 in 1998 to about 90 in 2005, and finishing at above 90 in 2006. Meanwhile, on average, 60 beds were utilized in ukrainian hospitals in 1997, and it saw a minimal growth from 60 to 65 in the period of 1998 to 2002, and then levelled off at around 70 in the next following three years. In contrast, the lowest average number of bed used was in french hospitals, in which it stood at 40 in the first year, climbing to about 67 in 2005 before stepping down to about 47 in 2006.
Moving to pie charts, in 2002, approximately two-thirds of the hospital budget was allocated to other costs, while in-patient care was 35%. However, in the following 4 years, the proportion of the other costs picked up by 8% while in-patient care dropped to about 27%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...In 1997, the average number of beds used in China was 70, increasing slowly from ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 33.7804878049 186% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75675675676 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67676745402 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.9842768578 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.857142857 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449822220736 0.215688989381 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20659929454 0.103423049105 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151517235965 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299799106972 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141179502312 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.