The charts below illustrate the average bed use in three typical hospitals internationally and the proportion of hospital budgets allocated to in patient care before and after day surgery was introduced in 2003

Essay topics:

The charts below illustrate the average bed use in three typical hospitals internationally and the proportion of hospital budgets allocated to in-patient care before and after day-surgery was introduced in 2003.

The diagrams illustrate the average number of beds utilized in three international hospitals (chinese, ukrainian and French), and the proportion of budget invested for in-patient care prior to and after day surgery was introduced in 2003.

Overall, there was an upward trend in the average number of beds used in the hospitals, and the percentage of hospital budget allocated to in-patient care experienced a small decrease.

In 1997, the average number of beds using in chinese was 70, increasing slowly from just below 80 in 1998 to about 90 in 2005, and finishing at above 90 in 2006. Meanwhile, on average, 60 beds were utilized in ukrainian in 1997, and it saw a minimal grew from 60 to 65 in the period of 1998 to 2002, then levelled off at around 70 in next following three years. In contrast, the lowest average number of bed applied was in France hospital, it stood at 40 in the first year, climbing to about 67 in 2005 before stepping down to about 47 in 2006.

Moving to pie charts, in 2002, approximately two-thirds of the hospital budget was allocated to other costs, while in-patient care was 35%. However, in the following 4 years, the proportion of the other cost picked up by 8%, and in-patient care dropped to about 27%.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (3 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, third, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76958525346 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67837494944 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543778801843 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.4744803575 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.857142857 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435360733345 0.215688989381 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19809324383 0.103423049105 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158699657786 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292803635829 0.15604864568 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150229702371 0.0819641961636 183% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.