The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt within in the three countries .
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams provide the information about how three different countries (South KKorea, Sweden and, the UK) cope with dangerous garbage products.
Overall, it evident that two countries (the uk and Sweden) mostly use burying method do deal with hazardous garbage, while north korean prefer to use environmental friendly method (recycling) to eliminate dangerous waste.
Moving to the detail, The United Kingdom and Sweden share similar method (underground) to eliminate hazardous garbage (82% and 55% respectively). In contrast, the remaining method (processing with chemical substances, throw to the sea, and incineration methods) is share small proportion in term of dealing with garbage in the UK. Furthermore, a quarter of hazardous garbage in Sweden is eliminating with recycling method and burning share the remaining fraction (20%).
Republic of North korean mostly use environmental friendly method to deal with waste. It accounts more than two-third. Following that is burying method (22%) and burning was the least use method to deal with hazardous garbage in North korean (9%).
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58536585366 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80132330419 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530487804878 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6948764113 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.04270427488 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0232063113193 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480088385286 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0464126226387 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594359435327 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.