Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?

Several people assume that social media such as Facebook has brought an extremely bad influence for personal and community. it admittedly true, however, the advantages of the online platform is worth to consider.

First and foremost, the advance of technology such as online social media has been attributed to the negative impact on psychology and health, due to addicting and sedentary behaviour. The user of these platforms prefers to interact with virtual friends than to socialize or participate in a social gathering. As a result, it would have a negative consequence on one’s personality such as lack of social and communication skill and social withdrawal. furthermore, it also leads to inactive behaviour such as spent a lot of their time in front of the computer. This attitude would increase the risk of overweight and other health consequences.

addicting to social networking could have a bad consequence to the community and it leads to failure in almost every fields. For example, most people in today world waste their time chatting or posting on Facebook or Twitter and fails to pay their attentions to the work or even family. it resulted in responsibilities neglected or event cause an accident. furthermore, social media endangered personal information and lead to cyber crime. The hacking of bank account, for instance, is often started with the leaking of personal information through social media.

Despite the demerit, I personally believe that social media has a positive aspect either for individual or society long as it uses on purpose and accordingly.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...d influence for personal and community. it admittedly true, however, the advantage...
^^
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...r personal and community. it admittedly true, however, the advantages of the online ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...munication skill and social withdrawal. furthermore, it also leads to inactive behaviour su...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Addicting
...ght and other health consequences. addicting to social networking could have a bad c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... attentions to the work or even family. it resulted in responsibilities neglected ...
^^
Line 9, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...s neglected or event cause an accident. furthermore, social media endangered personal infor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sonal information through social media. Despite the demerit, I personally believ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, so, for example, for instance, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32806324111 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99426355061 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577075098814 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4437618563 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.692307692 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188407601929 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620644691227 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503389215921 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110836745003 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026684850576 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.