The graph and table below show the changes in the number of overseas visitors and top 5 visitor countries to Britain in 2004 and 2005.
The bar chart illustrates the changes figure of the tourists coming to the UK in 2014 and 2015, while the table provides information about the top five visitor nations of the Great Britain’s tourism.
Overall, it is evident that the number of tourists visiting the UK in the meantime experienced a fluctuation. Japan, Australia and The United States were among the top three of the origin of the UK’s visitor.
In january 2004, around 600.000 of tourists travelled to Britain and the number decreased by 200.000 in March. Following this, the figure increased to more than 700.000 in June, reaching a peak at approximately 800.000 in December. Britain’s tourist number from january to march 2005 was slightly different. While the former accounted for just below 600.000, the latter was about 50.000 lower. In June, the figure increased moderately, levelled off in September, before it jumped to about 800.000 in December.
The top three of the visitor origin countries to the UK in 2004 were Japan, Australia and America and it changed by japan dropped to second-place with the change number -3%, while both australia and america ware +2% each. Also, a new country entering the top five list was India with an additional number of visitor 17%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10628019324 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72772805861 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56038647343 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7148772283 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.7 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282086676353 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105281973553 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789288112996 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169788471677 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749089879493 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.