The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe in 2005, 2009 and 2015, compared with the European average.
Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart gives information about how many cars were used per 1000 people in five countries in different years. These figures also compared with the European average.
overall, it is clear that the percentage of people in Germany driving a car is the highest in all three years; while, car ownership in Greece is the lowest figure.
The proportion of car owned in Greece fluctuated, about 300 per 1000 people in 2005, then this figure increased slightly to 400 owners after 4 years before decreasing to 300 again in 2005. car ownership saw a similar trend in Italia, reaching a peak at approximately 550 per 1000. However, in the UK, dwellers using their own car experienced a downward trend, from 700 per 1000 in 2005 to nearly 600 in 2015.
Meanwhile, the proportion of used cars in France remained at the same level throughout three years, 600 overall. By contrast, the ratio of Germany is the highest numbers, compared with the other countries, accounted for 900, 810, and nearly 1000 respectively. while the average in European, the number was 700 in 2005 and then it fell modestly to about 690 in 2009. In 2015, this figure went up significantly to 800.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
... compared with the European average. overall, it is clear that the percentage of peo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Car
...before decreasing to 300 again in 2005. car ownership saw a similar trend in Italia...
^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...900, 810, and nearly 1000 respectively. while the average in European, the number was...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80693069307 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61007545354 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618811881188 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6760122852 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32166883206 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119543353911 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657463130988 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193802453515 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968482926768 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.