School should not force children to learn a foreign language. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this globalization, a foreign language is crucial to everyone. However, it is argued that children should not be forced to study a second language except for their mother tongue in the curriculum. In my opinion, although learning the other language plays an important role in children's life, people are unable to force them to study multilanguage.

On the one hand, it is useful for offsprings to concentrate on studying the other language because the children, who are approximately five to nine years old, have their own ability to remember things effectively than the older people. For example, my three-year-old student whose name is Linh gets used to memorizing a range of vocabularies quickly for a long period. However, I am an adult; but I am not able to learn a new phrase in German. Moreover, it is helpful to learn a new language. Students can understand a culture, a tradition, and a lifestyle in an aboard country; and from that; they can enhance their knowledge. Last but not least, communicating an international language such as English is capable of acquiring more pieces of knowledge and getting more opportunities in the future career.

On the other hand, pupils cannot study a lot in a syllabus due to not focusing on the lessons. For instance, a student in Vietnam has to go to extra classes after schools, such as a mathematics class, a literature class, and a history class, etc. Therefore, she does not have enough time to do what she wants in a spare time. Moreover, the more students have to study an international language, the fewer they use it. This is because of studying a new language, they have to communicate or interact with a foreigner, or they will forget it after several months. Nonetheless, students cannot have sufficient time to meet a stranger and practice what they learned.

In conclusion, despite studying a new language has its disadvantage, children should learn it in the future because it is valuable for them in their career.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to force them to study multilanguage. On the one hand, it is useful for offspr...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, as to, except for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93154761905 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98332329788 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4824815791 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139167484335 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509577182785 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475582720148 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978048695908 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435149557254 0.056905535591 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.