The bar chart shows the number of overseas students enrolled in a third year Computer Science course at a Canadian college.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words

The given bar chart provides an insight about the enrollment of foreign students in the third year computer science course in the Canadian college. The vertical axis represents the ratio of pupils and the horizontal axis indicates about various nations of the world.

It is crystal clear that the ratio of male overseas students was very highest in the enrollment of networking core option in the Canadian college but it decreased to 4% in Malaysia from 5% in Singapore. However, the females were enrolled similarly by 7% in both the nations Whereas the women in china were very topest in the enrollment of database core option as compare with other nations.

Furthermore, according to the given information, it can be clearly notified that the men in china and Sri Lanka were equally recruited for networking core option while in France , the females showed a decline of 1% from 4% in Sri Lanka in their data base enrollment.

Overall, it indicates that the china was very highest in the enrollment of foreign students in Canadian college and the France was least in the enrollment of both males and females among all the countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and the horizontal axis indicates about various nations of the world. It is c...
^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...early notified that the men in china and Sri Lanka were equally recruited for net...
^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r networking core option while in France , the females showed a decline of 1% from...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, similarly, third, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96875 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62434082316 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526041666667 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.8487519103 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.0 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161611902884 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932778037586 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106662941987 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10014641108 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684693984987 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.