The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012.
The bar chart illustrates the annual number of visitors to three museums, National Gallery, Victoria and Albert, and british museums, in London from 2007 to 2010, in a duration of six years. overall, as it can be seen the national gallery has a gradual increase in the period, whereas the other galleries have an erratic trend in the same years. In 2007, the number of visitors to the national gallery was about 7 million, while this number for Victoria and Albert and british museums was roughly 14 and 12 respectively. In the next year, the national gallery has a slight increase but a half decline accrued for British museum and Victoria and Albert remain static. In the third year, the visitors from three museums were near to each other between 5-12 million yearly. In the last year of 10s national gallery stood ahead by about 3 million raised. this trend continued until last year, where national gallery archived almost 16m visitors in compares of 10m and 14m for Victoria and Albert and British museums respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...07 to 2010, in a duration of six years. overall, as it can be seen the national gallery...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 668, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and Victoria and Albert remain static. In the third year, the visitors from three...
^^
Line 1, column 772, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...each other between 5-12 million yearly. In the last year of 10s national gallery s...
^^
Line 1, column 852, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... stood ahead by about 3 million raised. this trend continued until last year, where ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87428571429 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41034505109 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537142857143 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6178420542 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227010663444 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111032703047 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104240260966 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227010663444 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.