The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
The chart illustrates the proportion of the young people pursuing higher education in four different countries in 2000,2005 and 2010.
Overall, it can be seen country D had the highest percentage of young people entering higher education during three years. In addition, both country A and country D experienced a significant increase in the proportion of young people joining in higher education.
In 2000, there were about 35% young people who paticipated in higher education in country A while 80% of young people took part in higher education in country D. In 2010, there were a significant growth of about 20% in the young people’s participation in higher education in both countries A and D.
The year 2005 witnessed a slight decrease to under 40% in the percentage of young people in higher education in country B. Additionally, the proportion of participants in 2000 and 2010 are equal at 40% in country B. In 2000, 50% young people entering higher education in country C while this figure remained stable at around more than 50% between 2005 and 2010
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
- Technology is becoming more and more prevalent in the world today Given time technology will completely replace the teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources Internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her education in both countries A and D. The year 2005 witnessed a slight decreas...
^^^
Line 4, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ound more than 50% between 2005 and 2010
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99438202247 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86645157437 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460674157303 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.9336836088 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.485886478562 0.215688989381 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.274539506008 0.103423049105 265% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110793096259 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366334663614 0.15604864568 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869478686499 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.