The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
The diagram gives information about the rate of pupils who calculated the high score for separate factors at one university during the years 2000, 2005, and 2010. Overall, electronic resources surged dramatically; meanwhile, a substantial decrease in the range of modules offered occurred in these years.
On the one hand, the percentage of learners who rated high points for electronic resources was approximately 45% in 2000, and then it soared sharply up to 72% and 88% in 2005 and 2010, respectively. Besides that, teaching quality was also one of the factors, which was responded well by students, increasing from 65% to 69% in 2000 and 2010 accordingly.
On the other hands, some categories, like buildings/teaching facilities, and print resources, maintained stability for good votes for the three years; even if the rate of the students changed, it only fluctuated 1% to 2% slightly. The range of modules offered changed during these years of surveys. In 2000, the rate of learners for the factor was very low at only about 32%; however, by 2005 and 2010, this declined more steeply by about 30% to 27%, consequently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, consequently, however, if, so, then, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15135135135 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96369066896 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627027027027 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9311262623 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.142857143 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5714285714 5.23603664747 259% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215058158085 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980139856088 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939482024915 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153896153462 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357825117285 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.