The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
The bar chart compares four different countries in terms of the proportion of young people entering higher education in three years, 2000, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, of the three countries, country D had the highest percentage of young people enrolling in higher education in all three years, while participation levels in country B were lowest. In addition, countries A and D experienced the greatest increase in young people’s participation in higher education.
Looking first at countries A and D, in 2000, 60% of young people in country D entered university education, while the figure for country A was much lower, at only about 38%. A decade later, these figures rose significantly to 80% and around 59%, respectively.
Turning to the two remaining nations, we can see that, in country C,young people’s university participation rose slightly by 2%, from 50% in 2000 to 52% in 2010. The figure for country B, by contrast, remained at 40% over the period shown, despite a small drop of 2%, down to 38% in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-24 | letrang250191 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | letrang250191 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | mya223 | view | |
| 2023-06-12 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 75
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 84
- Some people believe that schoo children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children 56
- It is the best tp accept bad situation in our life such as unsatisfactory jobs or shortage of money Dicuss bith views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , young
...g nations, we can see that, in country C,young people’s university participation rose ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03529411765 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92231599863 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0559204614 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325732106642 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160507159891 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146383699225 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230035416374 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154685646203 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.