The bar chart illustrates the proportion of UK's workforce dividing by five main industries between two years, 1841 and 2011. It is clear that all industries were suffered a significant change in employment during the period, especially in services, manufacturing and agriculture/fishing.
In 1841, the number of employees working in services just accounted for a quarter, however, it had jumped dramatically to 81% of total workforce by 2011. By contrast, the two industrial lines, manufacturing and agriculture/fishing, saw a significant decline during the period. Manufacturing industry experienced a decrease from 36% to 9% and agriculture/fish even dropped to 1% from 22% of staffs.
Besides the above fluctuations, the remaining industrial lines had a steadily trend as in both years, they just accounted for under 10% of total employees in the UK. While construction reported a slightly increase by 3%, the workforce of energy/water, however decreased by 2% in 2011.
In conclusion, there was a significant movement in workforce among industries in UK, which the most employees transferred apparently from manufacturing and agriculture/fishing to services during 1841 - 2011.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('trend') instead of another adjective.
...ons, the remaining industrial lines had a steadily trend as in both years, they just accounted f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... in the UK. While construction reported a slightly increase by 3%, the workforce of energy/water, h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, however, if, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72316384181 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.81730307975 2.65546596893 144% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3808504812 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296968846152 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135961390948 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132240577776 0.0843802449381 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19570984177 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852235123798 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.