People's opinion differ as to whether or not road system development and maintenance should be charged to the government. While there are some strong arguments against the payment responsibility, I still believe that it should be shared to both the government and the drivers.
There are several reasons why people might argue that the government should be responsible for the road systems. Firstly, the transportation issues are one of the public infrastructures that fundamentally impact to economic sustainable growth. It's scale is too big to afford by any drivers in general. Secondly, each organization or individual have already paid of great tax amount as their social obligation to the State Budget, delegating the authorities to tackle on behalf of them on those kind of problems such as public health services, transportation, public housings, etc. That payment should be enough and no reason for any extra cash out in terms of public sectors.
In spite of the above arguments, I support the view that the drivers need to support partly to the road development fund. The increasing car numbers put a huge pressure on not only road systems but also environment footprints such as air pollution caused by petrol emission. That why this should be responsible by the driver community. The main benefit is that it raises awareness of public-owned protection, particularly transportation infrastructures. And the other benefit is that it might keep the car using ratio lower by charging toll fee based on the distance and the frequency of using. In doing so, the related problems such as traffic congestion or gas emission are also improved much more.
In conclusion, the road infrastructure is one of the crucial items that the government is responsible for building and maintaining, but I believe that car users should go side by side with the authorities to settle this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
Peoples opinion differ as to whether or not road system development and maintenance...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...horities to tackle on behalf of them on those kind of problems such as public health servi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h the authorities to settle this issue.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, as to, in conclusion, in general, kind of, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18300653595 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08150353899 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578431372549 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6649659609 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270078223936 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866864043502 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762566371138 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166156691844 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531466325882 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.