The bar chart shows the study habits of people in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part-time

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the study habits of people in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part-time

The bar chart shows the study habits of people in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.

It is clear from the chart that at the beginning of the 70s, men dominated women in part-time education. But this trend got changed by the 90s when more women started doing part-time education. When it comes to full-time studies, there is an increase in the number of people doing further education from the 70s to the 90s.

From the first chart, a slight decrease can be observed in the number of men did part-time education from the 70s to 90s, which are 1000000 and 900000 respectively. However, this is not the case with full-time education, where a growth from 100000 to 250000 occurred.

There is a rise in the number of women who did both further educations. Women who did part-time at the beginning of the 70s were around 700000, later increased around 1100000 by the 90s. Those who did full-time education were less than 100000 in the 70s and later rose around 200000 by the 90s.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43464576479 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522222222222 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.236657641 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415825457039 0.215688989381 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202833316719 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.284578455227 0.0843802449381 337% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359876262217 0.15604864568 231% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.370309433067 0.0819641961636 452% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.