The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news, by age group 2011
The bar chart illustrates three types of media to update the daily news of five different age groups in 2011. Overall, radio is the most popular way to get the news while that for microblogging was used less. Moreover, whereas social networking experienced an upward trend, that for radio witnessed a slight decrease but it still remained at first rate.
Starting with social networking. It is clear that the proportion of individuals from the age of 10 to 17 and 18 to 29 were outnumber that for other groups with 80%. Additionally, the figure for people using this media inclined constantly to nearly 25% at the age of over 65.
Moving to Radio and Microblogging. In the group of 10 to 17 years old, the proportion for the latter was 20%, which was the lowest while that for the former was nearly twice as high as this. Moving to people from 18 to 29 years old, the figure radio reached a peak of over 90% and that for its counterpart increased to 25%. In three remain group, the percentage of two media witnessed a similar trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...s from the age of 10 to 17 and 18 to 29 were outnumber that for other groups with 80...
^^^^
Line 2, column 124, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outnumbered'.
Suggestion: outnumbered
...m the age of 10 to 17 and 18 to 29 were outnumber that for other groups with 80%. Additio...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ditionally, the figure for people using this media inclined constantly to nearly 25%...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5752688172 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57589729014 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7147393458 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234406430247 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978294983091 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164897899614 0.0843802449381 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167433429388 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122783421818 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.