the bar charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing coutries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990

The given bar chart explains average years of schooling, scientist and technicians per 1000 people and research and development spending on developing and developed countries in 1980 and 1990. Overall, it is clear from chart the figures for developed are more than those of developing countries. The participation in education and science is almost higher in developed nations.
From the first chart the years of schooling is around 3 years in developing nations and in developed nations it is about 11 years. In 1980 and 1990 the average years of schooling is higher in developed nations as compared to developing nations.
In case of scientists and technicians it less than 20 per 1000 people in developing countries and in industrialised countries it is doubled that is more than 60 . In other hand spending on research and development in 1980 it is about 50 us $ and in 1990 it is 25$. In developed nations in 1990 levels of participation is above 300$ and in developing countries it is about 250$.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given bar chart explains average yea...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is almost higher in developed nations. From the first chart the years of schoo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nations. From the first chart the years of schooling is around 3 years...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons as compared to developing nations. In case of scientists and technicians it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tries it is doubled that is more than 60 . In other hand spending on research and ...
^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...es it is doubled that is more than 60 . In other hand spending on research and dev...
^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$25'.
Suggestion: $25
...0 it is about 50 us $ and in 1990 it is 25$. In developed nations in 1990 levels of...
^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...is about 50 us $ and in 1990 it is 25$. In developed nations in 1990 levels of par...
^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$300'.
Suggestion: $300
...n 1990 levels of participation is above 300$ and in developing countries it is abou...
^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...90 levels of participation is above 300$ and in developing countries it is about ...
^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$250'.
Suggestion: $250
...and in developing countries it is about 250$.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94674556213 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99057489167 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437869822485 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9482602647 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 5.23603664747 12% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376048337312 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189491254716 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728881503355 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27009832287 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825409584456 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.