The given bar chart gives the information about the percentage of females and males in Australia on various levels of post school qualifications held in the year 1999. Overall, the percentage of males in skilled vocational diploma, post graduate diploma and master's degree is higher than females. Females have more percentage in undergraduate diploma and bachelor's degree as compared to males.
It is clear from the chart that more than 90% of males had skilled vocational diploma in opposing females had only 10% which 3 times lesser than males. Around 70% of males had post graduate diploma and females had only 30%. In case of masters's degree males had more percentage than females.
In contrast, 70% of females had under graduate diploma which 2 times greater as compared to males. A slight difference was seen in both females and males in bachelor's degree.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given bar chart gives the informatio...
^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iploma and masters degree is higher than females. Females have more percentage in...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bachelors degree as compared to males. It is clear from the chart that more tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. Around 70% of males had post graduate diploma and females had only 30%. In cas...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ales had more percentage than females. In contrast, 70% of females had under gr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... graduate diploma which 2 times greater as compared to males. A slight difference ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 143.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04195804196 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45807182446 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61246611779 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503496503497 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6221490087 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.125 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0944273299847 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501770313218 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819289763266 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692301057067 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580934893468 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.