The bar chart demonstrate the statistical information about marriage and divorce status by the people of american according to the various number, in between two year, 1970 to 2000.
At first glance marital status has same, it is between 2 millions to 2.5 millions in year 1970 to 2000. On other hand divorced rates are same in the year 1970 and 2000 is 1 millions. It is the smallest rate of the chart of divorce while in 1980 divorced number is increased up to 1.4 millions also divorced rate is rises 1.2 million at 1990 year.
According to the chart marital status of adult people are staidly go upward in 1970 to the rates are higher than 65 percentage. It is higher than the other. divorced and widowed people are less in 1970. unmarried rate is approx 12 percentage. In year 2000 married people growth is also increased and widowed, divorced and unmarried ration is less as compare to the married ratio.
On the conclusion, in both chart shows the higher rates of marital status, so the peoples relationship is strong and they can live happy life together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Divorced
...ercentage. It is higher than the other. divorced and widowed people are less in 1970. un...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unmarried
...ed and widowed people are less in 1970. unmarried rate is approx 12 percentage. In year 2...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
..., divorced and unmarried ration is less as compare to the married ratio. On the...
^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... higher rates of marital status, so the peoples relationship is strong and they can liv...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70744680851 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47446785642 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515957446809 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2674851126 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32305180828 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129461299875 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863082544942 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203426552921 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767828407229 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.