Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.
This map illustrates the city of Brandfield and the two locations which were named S1 and S2, were suggested by the city planners to develop a new shopping centre. Overall, the first location (S1) suggested for the shopping centre is on the north closed to the housing area, whereas the other location (S2) is in the southwest of the city centre, closer to the industrial part of the town. On the west side of the town, a golf course and a park cover a large area which prevents any possible construction of a shopping centre.
The first possible site (S1) is located between the residential area and the city centre makes it easier to access. The river which runs through the middle of the town passes on the west of the site. Furthermore, it can be noticed that the railway and the main road are running close by the first purposed location.
The second location (S2), however, is located in the southwest of the city centre, adjacent to the industrial part of the town. As the first site, it can be easily accessed by railway or motorway.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-22 | Ipek Ciray | 73 | view |
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children`s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 61
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children`s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 78
- In the last 20 years there have been significant developments in the field of information technology (IT), for example the World Wide Web and communication by email. However, these developments in IT are likely to have more negative effects than positive 67
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, second, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5614973262 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47196526201 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508021390374 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6738178355 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219807659943 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953482787383 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105412654694 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140047654413 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995559387284 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.