The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The table illustrates the percentages of the student attendance in four different types of secondary schools from 2000 to 2009. Overall, the most noticeable finding was while the attendance at community schools was increasing, attendance at the other three schools gradually decreased over the whole period.
In 2000, the majority of the pupils preferred the voluntary-controlled schools which accounted for 52%, followed by grammar schools with 24%. Specialist schools and community schools had a similar attendance with 12% in 2000.
In 2005, voluntary-controlled schools experienced a dramatic decline in pupil numbers, which fell down to 38%, however, remained still be the most chosen school type. Community schools, on the other hand, showed an increase in the number of pupils and became the second most chosen school type with 32% in 2005. The rate of attendance at grammar schools and the specialist schools fell slightly and accounted for 19% and 11%, respectively.
In 2009, community schools became the most popular school overtaking voluntary-controlled schools with 58%. All the other three school types continued to show a downward trend and voluntary-controlled schools finishing the period at 20%, grammar schools at 12% and specialist schools at 10%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to school'
Suggestion: to school
...ever, remained still be the most chosen school type. Community schools, on the other h...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to school'
Suggestion: to school
...upils and became the second most chosen school type with 32% in 2005. The rate of atte...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58762886598 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34630981091 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1590899881 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.444444444 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364874064791 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190209547739 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103443963069 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247885782339 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553894286836 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.