The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The assigned table chart depicts the information about the percentage of students attending four different types of school from 2000 to 2009.
From the overall analysis, it is manifest to see that, just over one half of learners prefered to study in Voluntary controlled school in 2000. However, majority of students attended community schools.
A cursory glance at the given table chart is enough to see that, in 2000, only 12% of students attended specialist school.This figure decreased to 10% in 2009. As far as grammar schools were concerned, almost a quarter of pupils studied in this school but the percentage of students attending grammar schools dwindled to 12% in last year.
with regards to Voluntary schools, initiating at 52% in 2000 and declining to 38% in 2006, the percentage of students attending this school fall to 20% in last year. Lastly, only few students were interested in attending community schools during 2000 and 2005, but the percentage of learners studying in community schools sky rocketed to 58% in 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le chart is enough to see that, in 2000, only 12% of students attended specialist...
^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... of students attended specialist school.This figure decreased to 10% in 2009. As far...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
... schools dwindled to 12% in last year. with regards to Voluntary schools, initiatin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12941176471 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69950655494 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.595918157 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311649231999 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159708105799 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872272026166 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216966874218 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877097279541 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.