The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children`s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.
The pie graph illustrates the amount of income and expenditures of an American charity organisation of children in 2016. Overall, the total income of the charity slightly exceeded the spent. It can also be seen that the major source of income was donated food and the major expenditure was program services.
In detail, the main revenue for the charity was food donations which accounted for 86,6% of all the income. Community contributions were the second biggest source with just 10,4%. The other revenue sources covered minor percentages, which were with 2,2% program revenue, 0,2% government grants, 0,2% investment income and with 0,4% other income.
Program services, on the other hand, accounted for the majority of the spent with 95,8%. Fundraising was the second spent with 2,6%, followed by management and general expenditure with 1,6%.
The amount of the total income was $53,561,580 which was exceeding just about the outgoing which was $53,224,896 in total.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-22 | Ipek Ciray | 78 | view |
- The chart shows the number of female and male people arrested by type of offence crime 46
- The pie chart shows the number of people who were using different languages online The table shows the average number of people online each year 74
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children`s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 78
- Nowadays artificial intelligence is being used to drive cars Why is this happening Is it a positive or negative development 91
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children`s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 26.3917525773 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 937.175257732 88% => OK
No of words: 154.0 206.0 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33766233766 4.54256449028 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59321090343 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 127.690721649 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 290.88556701 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6182083434 44.8134815571 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 76.5299724578 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 16.8248392259 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 4.34317383033 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0959782668378 0.216113520407 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537538272772 0.0766984524023 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707152854643 0.0603063233224 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062444181178 0.12726935374 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548366021005 0.0580467560999 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 8.37731958763 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 8.71597938144 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 41.2886597938 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.