The map shows the proposal of two prospective sites for building a new shopping mall in Brandfield.
There are some similarities of both proposed sites (S1 and S2). Both places are surrounded by the main road, the railway, and the city centre. Moreover, they are almost equally close from the golf course and park area on the west. However, there are some differences of both locations.
S1 is easily accessible from the housing estate nearby on the north side. Furthermore, there is a river on the east which can be worth a view. However, this site is too far from the industrial estate area on the south east.
On the other hand, S2 is very close from the industrial estate on the south side. However, the surrounding lacks of the river view, and the site is too far to be reached from the residential area.
In summary, S1 is an ideal site for the shopping mall if the main customers will be people from the residential area. However, S2 will be the alternative choice for targeting customers from the industrial site. In addition, S1 will be expected to have a better view.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67708333333 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57053280253 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.547539520022 92% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.4367430978 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.0769230769 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7692307692 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173752145795 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067513594148 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701479476906 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11289309285 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848132488886 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.