Below tables are the use of water by four different countries
The table compares the amount of water usage in 3 different purposes in 4 nations.
Overall, it is clear that the proportion of water in Agriculture was the highest compared to other 2 factors. Moreover, while Egypt dominated the first place in both domestical and agricultural purposes, it was Canada which saw the highest figure in Industry.
In terms of domestical sector, Egypt and Saudi Abrabia accounted for the more significant amount of water, at 12% and 10% respectively. In contrast, New Zealand and Canada, which made up below 10% of water use, witnessed the lowest position in this domestical ranking.
Referring to the industrial purpose, Canada achieved the highest figure in the water’s proportion with 70%. Likewise, while New Zealand consumed 46% of water in this year, Saudi Abrabia also accounted for remarkable number, at 30%. However, it was Egypt which accounted for only 10% of water .The trend was totally different when it came to the agricultural figure. While Egypt, Saudi Abrabia and New Zealand allocated significant amount of water, at 82%, 64% and 44% each, Canada was the only nation experienced the least remarkable figure in this term, at only 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-11 | soarne | 67 | view |
| 2020-09-29 | quynhnhi280103 | 71 | view |
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalilites and areas 78
- Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of population aged 65 and above in three countries 78
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
- The diagram below describes how storm water is recycled in an Australian city 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...pt which accounted for only 10% of water .The trend was totally different when it ...
^^
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... which accounted for only 10% of water .The trend was totally different when it cam...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, while, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13402061856 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71909048706 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530927835052 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0447705383 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169183991549 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856460194024 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729771693698 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131209431626 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802692292398 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.