The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began.
The bar chart and line graph illustrate proportions of people from both genders who participated in the Olympics over 90 years.
From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the number of female and male participants increased throughout the given period. However, what is significant the most is that more and more women had joined the Olympic games.
To begin with, in 1924, a minor proportion of women of well under 300 females participated in the Olympics, whereas the number of males was ten times higher, at 3000 players. A decade later, the figures for both genders rose considerably, standing at 4,500 men as opposed to only 500 women. Furthermore, in the year 1984, the chart noted a significant increase of about 1,200 more ladies taking part in the Olympics. The figure for males in that year rose to well over 5 thousand candidates. By the final year, there wasn’t a major increase in the amount of male players, but that of females soared up reaching almost 5,000 participants.
Generally, there was an obvious difference in the combined number of both genders between the initial and final year. Starting from 1924, the period commenced with around 3,500 candidates and continued in rocketing up till just over 10,000 female and male Olympic player.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01408450704 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68621742753 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615023474178 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3578142402 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10417902897 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434936697901 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614093534576 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842515394508 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746761046198 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.