The chart below give information about how many Europe citizens of various age groups who frequently go to the gym from 1990 to 2010

Essay topics:

The chart below give information about how many Europe citizens of various age groups who frequently go to the gym from 1990 to 2010.

The line graph give information about how many Europe citizens of age groups who alway go to the exercise in 1990 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the age group of 24-33 is higher among four age group but in 1990 the age group is 34-43 is lowest. However, we can see if we look at the specific figure.
Look at the line graph in 1990. It can be seen that, the general people of age group in Europe cities for 24-33 is higher have number is 16%. Meanwhile, the age groups in Europe cities go to the gym lowest 44-53 among four age groups and only have 5% and twenty times lower than 24-33 age group. By contrast, the second lower after 44-53 is 34-43 age group have 6% Old people in Europe cities not always go to the gym because they have many health problem.However, with remaining one group is 18-23 age group there is not much date on the deviation respectively with 24-33 is 16% and 15%.
Look at the line graph in 2010. The general of people go to the gym in Europe cities of 34-43 and 44-53 is lowest among four age group but increased 2% about 10 with 34-43 and 9 with 44-53. By contrast, the all age groups and 18-23 have significantly increased is 25% have ten time higher than in 1990. Both age group have same the change percent is 10%. Finally, with the remaining one group is 24-33 is increased percent 10% have 26% in 2010. So, it can be seen that have many young people like go to the exercise in Europe than older people.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...group but in 1990 the age group is 34-43 is lowest. However, we can see if we loo...
^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun health seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much health', 'a good deal of health'.
Suggestion: much health; a good deal of health
... always go to the gym because they have many health problem.However, with remaining one gro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...m because they have many health problem.However, with remaining one group is 18-23 age ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... significantly increased is 25% have ten time higher than in 1990. Both age group...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.24275362319 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10622583086 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.409420289855 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3775288133 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0769230769 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320688993871 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141335956209 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136805988426 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28479275823 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166744911404 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.31 11.4140731707 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.22 8.06136585366 77% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.