The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000.
The graphs give information about the rate of women and men aged 60-64 who are engaged in four homelands from 1970 to 2000.
Overall, the percentage of men employed in USA is highest among 4 countries in 1970 but this rate is decline in 2000. However, the completely different we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the first bar chart in 1970, it can be seen that the percentage of men and women employed in Japan is lowest among four countries and have number is 76% with men and 56% with women. However, the rate of men and women employed in USA is highest and have number is 86% and 78%. The second after USA is Indonesia with number is 84% and 65%. By contrast, after Indonesia is Belgium have figure number 79% and 63%.
Look at the second bar chart in 2000. The rate of women and man in Belgium is lowest among 4 countries and especially the rate of women in this year is significantly down and only have 8% and men is 52%. By contrast, the rate of women in remaining 3 countries only about 2 to 3 percent apart. In USA have number is 45%, Japan and Indonesia is 47% and 50%. Although, the rate of men is stable and have highest number is 78% in USA. The second after USA is 74% in Indonesia. Finally, in Japan only have number is 63%. So, it can be seen that the rate of women and men in USA and Indonesia is stable and higher than remaining 3 countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 396, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...Although, the rate of men is stable and have highest number is 78% in USA. The second after ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 7.0 314% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 6.8 294% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.1992481203 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28487630563 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.37969924812 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.162020342 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.4666666667 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273291643139 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981820893545 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124605662309 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227420695865 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125109812742 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.78 11.4140731707 59% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.32 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.