In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering health problem as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In some homeland, have the high rate of people are suffering from health problem as a result eating too much fast food. Some people believed that government need to increase the overall tax on this kind of food. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are som argument in favor of government need to impose a higher tax of this food because this food make many people have health problem. First, government subsidies for kind of food are believed to equalize health and living conditions among modern life regardless of their family backgrounds. This fast food support, presumably tends not only help poor people and busier can eat faster but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, fast food can minimize the time of busy people, sometimes it also helps sick people to eat this fast food to reduce higher. Moreover, if the cost of this cost of this food is increased, it will be difficult to grow. Fast food is very popular it will be difficult to export if it increase, fast food would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that kind of food and export rate is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once have many people have healthy problem by fast food. First, government increase a tax of this food would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. When government impose a higher tax very difficult to export due to high cost and few users. Generating no income from school, export, government could become over-reliant n the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as the healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, fast food is suitable for busy people. If government impose a higher tax would make many disadvantages for work and society, thereby great burdens for authorities and human and potentially wasting time that these people could have spent pursuing more suitable diet. It, instead, would be far more financial viable option if the resources were focused on supporting less privileged yet gifted people.
I was discussed both sides of the argument. In my perspective, this argument have disadvantages outweigh advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 793, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...ar it will be difficult to export if it increase, fast food would probably result in a g...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, in fact, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13267813268 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73943764129 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523341523342 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7477215909 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.947368421 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436248983335 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146441588555 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105480808093 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26776605571 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149216018954 0.056905535591 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.