The graphs show the number of internationally travellers to three different regions in a European country during five years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph give information about the number of foreigners who visited three different areas in a particular European country from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, the aggregate visit rate in 2007 was highest but in 5 years ago, have the lowest figures of the lakes or mountain. However, we can see learn more if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the line graph in 1987, it can be seen that the coast was the most popular tourist spot, with 40 thousand people choosing that. However, the rate of foreigners visiting the mountains and the lakes was lowest in 1987, have only 20 thousand people and 10 thousand people. By contrast, the number of international traveller to three different region in 15 years later have the increased significantly in 1997 and 2002, with 30 thousand people of the mountain and the lakes similar. Besides, in 2002, the mountain decreased 20 thousand people but the lakes increased from 30 to 70 thousand people.
Look at the line graph in the last year is 2007, the coast was still the highest regions among three areas, with 70 thousand people. Ranked after the coast in term of higher is the lakes about 55 thousand people. Finally, the mountain was lowest 30 thousand people. So, it can be seen that the people in European prefer traveling to the coast and the lakes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
...ernational traveller to three different region in 15 years later have the increased si...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, however, if, look, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1077.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70305676856 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41545906948 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475982532751 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9497928954 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9090909091 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126485274156 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571319959141 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074453536157 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986285947707 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691169527246 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.