The chart shows information about the percentage of men and women aged 60-64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000.
The bar graph illustrates regard proportion of workers in accordance to sexes which included age group from 60-64 in four nations since 1970 and 2000.
To begin with, it is clear by analysing histogram that, during 1970, Belgium had similar number of women and men workers with difference of 20%. Yet, in 2000, women had drastic lower count (8%) rather than men employees which shown the highest number upto half of total. Furthermore, once more, during era of 1970, USA represented similar proportion of employees of both men (87%) and women (79%) with distinction of 6%. However, in same nation in duration of second era, this represented higher proportion of male with 79% in comparison to female which was upto 41% respectively.
In addition, in Japan, there was difference of 30% in between couple of sexes of employees in year of 1970. On contrast, in 2000, male and female revealed similar count around 50% in Japan. Lastly, there was the highest proportion of men (82%) as compared to women (61%) in Indonesia during first year. Yet, in era of 2000, Indonesia had female workers which were half of total while men shown maximum proportion with 71% respectively.
Overall, during first year, there was little difference in proportion of couple of sex workers whereas in second era, this shown huge distinction in their proportion.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, second, so, whereas, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96860986547 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62126706813 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529147982063 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3031618578 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.8 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161132660255 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719678691885 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545244780153 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106188209971 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699199311619 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.