The bar chart illustrates the percentage of women giving birth to their first kid over a 40-year period starting from 1996.
From an overall perspective, all the figures showed an upward trend, with a contrast to the data for people aged 19 or younger and between 20 and 24 years old. Additionally, it is clear that the proportion of the 30-34s experienced the most biggest growth throughout the period shown.
Regarding the rate of young people aged 19 and under, starting from about 40% in 1996, being greatly slower than that of the 20-24s, it had had a gradual decline to under 10% until 2006. A similar trend was observed in the data for the 20-24 age group with a drop to 35% in 2006, despite recording the highest figure in the intial year of the period.
Turning to the percentage of 25-to 30-year-old people, it stood at over 40% in 1996, which is significantly higher than that of the others, at under 15%. In the 20 following years, the statistic for the 25-30s hit the highest value on record of nearly 60% in 1996, before witnessing a decrease to 45% in 2006. During this time, the rate of people in the age range of 30 to 34 and 34 to 39 both exhibited an upsurge to about 55% and 30% respectively. Meanwhile, a slight change was seen in the figure for people aged 40 or older with a rise by 2% at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'biggest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: biggest
...roportion of the 30-34s experienced the most biggest growth throughout the period shown. Re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the biggest'.
Suggestion: most the biggest
...roportion of the 30-34s experienced the most biggest growth throughout the period shown. Re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39516129032 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46742565968 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568548387097 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 20.7257220756 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.111111111 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118738076839 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521692290585 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059805494758 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913936655549 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718258161652 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.