The bar chart compares the rate of birth and death in Switzerland over a period of forty years from 1970. It also forecast trends untill 2020.
It can be seen from the graph that in 1970, the birth rate was the highest at 1. 2 million, whereas the death rate was exactly 1 million in this country. In contrast, the death rate( 1.3 million) was slightly higher than that of birth rate( 1. 2 million) in 1980. At the same time, the figure for birth rate was a moderate 1. 8 million, as opposed to to merely 1. 6 million by 1990. However, the number of deaths nearly a half in 2000 that of birth rate. Similarly, the figure for birth rate in Switzerland had the largest a massive at 3 million, as against only one million of deaths in 2010.
Projections upto 2020 indicates that the birth rate is estimated to improve and it will reach 3. 3 million, but the number of deaths will touch well under 1 million in the same country.
Overall, it is clear that Switzerland's birth rate is likely to increasing, while the death rate is decreasing within the given period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...was a moderate 1. 8 million, as opposed to to merely 1. 6 million by 1990. However, t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Switzerland had the largest a massive at 3 million, as against only one million o...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st only one million of deaths in 2010. Projections upto 2020 indicates that th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, similarly, so, well, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41116751269 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36174297603 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51269035533 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7532450324 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.0714285714 112.824112599 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.0714285714 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349078610211 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132578867638 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106414686879 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245813596878 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875453247487 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.4 13.2329268293 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 91.11 61.2550243902 149% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.71 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.74 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.