the chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005
The line graph illustrates the proportion of cars owned by people living in Britain over a period of 30 years, commencing in 1975.
As can be inferred from the graph, while there were gradual increases in the percentage of owning 2 cars and 3 cars, the downward trend was seen in that of having no car. Another key feature is that possessing 1 car accounted for the highest rate during the period shown.
In 1975, the ratio of having 3 cars in the UK was lowest, with approximately 4%. This figure rose gradually to in the vicinity of 10% by 2005. A similar upward trend was witnessed in the figure for 2 cars, with which climbing from about 6% in 1975 to nearly 19% by the end of the period studied.
A downward pattern was registered in the proportion of no car. To be specific, the rate of no car was about 44%. This figure decreased significantly to approximately 22% by the last year. Finally, there was a gradual fall from 45% in the year 1975 to about 39% in the ratio of 1 car before climbing considerably to 45% by the end of the period survey
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% by the last year. Finally, there was a gradual fall from 45% in the year 1975 t...
^^
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l from 45% in the year 1975 to about 39% in the ratio of 1 car before climbing co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37055837563 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58613375808 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6641729568 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225589390541 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935090368045 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508165371397 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139431855617 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445512848062 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.